Information denied apprehending endanger to the life or physical safety of the officers

Appellant had sought information pertaining to the names of CEO, A.E, J.E present at the time of sealing of the property which was not disclosed due to security reasons and disclosure of the same had no relationship to any larger public interest.
CIC upheld the said decision observing that disclosure of details of CEO, A.E, J.E who were present during sealing of the property may endanger the life or physical safety of the said officers and thus cannot be disclosed as per Section 8(1)(g) of the RTI Act.
Ritesh Tanwar vs. CPIO, Delhi Cantonment Board
File No : CIC/DCBRD/A/2018/152730


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *